Phishing & Scams

On this page

Core Security Principles Typical Risk Scenarios How to Recognize Suspicious Requests What to Do When Something Looks Wrong Routine Checklist Security Statement

Core Security Principles

To understand Phishing & Scams, start by separating the wallet interface from the underlying chain state. Phishing often uses urgency, lookalike pages, fake support or reward claims to push a user toward a signature. Domain verification, request review and source validation are more reliable than visual polish.

Lookalike domains should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet. Fake support should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet. Fake airdrops should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet. If the origin or meaning of a request cannot be verified, stopping and checking a trusted source is safer than approving something that is not understood.

Typical Risk Scenarios

In everyday use, fake support, fake airdrops and malicious links often appear in the same workflow. They should be evaluated together in the context of the user’s actual intent rather than as isolated interface labels.

Fake support should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet. Fake airdrops should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet. Malicious links should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet. If the origin or meaning of a request cannot be verified, stopping and checking a trusted source is safer than approving something that is not understood.

lookalike domainsLookalike domains should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet.

fake supportFake support should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet.

fake airdropsFake airdrops should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet.

malicious linksMalicious links should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet.

How to Recognize Suspicious Requests

A useful review model has three moments: confirm the intended context before acting, inspect the requested permission while signing, and verify the public result after submission. This keeps interface assumptions separate from on-chain facts.

Fake airdrops should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet. Malicious links should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet. Remote access should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet. If the origin or meaning of a request cannot be verified, stopping and checking a trusted source is safer than approving something that is not understood.

What to Do When Something Looks Wrong

Many problems that appear complicated are really context mismatches: the wrong network, an unexpected contract, a stale permission or a transaction that is still pending. Breaking the problem into those parts makes independent verification easier.

Malicious links should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet. Remote access should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet. Lookalike domains should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet. If the origin or meaning of a request cannot be verified, stopping and checking a trusted source is safer than approving something that is not understood.

Never share a seed phrase, private key or verification code.
Verify the domain, network and contract before approving.
Reject unexpected signing requests.
Review and revoke permissions you no longer need.

Routine Checklist

A repeatable routine is more dependable than memory. Confirm the network first, then the destination or contract, then the amount, fee and request details, and finally keep the transaction hash or approval record for later checking.

Remote access should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet. Lookalike domains should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet. Fake support should be verified in the context of the active network, the user’s intended action and the information shown by the wallet. If the origin or meaning of a request cannot be verified, stopping and checking a trusted source is safer than approving something that is not understood.

Confirm the active network
Verify the destination or contract
Review the amount and fee
Understand the signature or approval
Keep the transaction hash for verification

Security Statement

The next step is to connect this topic with transfer checks, wallet security and Web3 permissions. Good technical knowledge should help a user decide what to inspect when a request is unfamiliar, not merely define terminology.